Slavery is Alive and Well in the USA: Who Owns You?

Authored or posted by | Updated on | Published on November 12, 2015 | Reply
Share Button

United States CourtroomThe article below is a must read for anyone who wants to know the “forbidden” history of the USA and why the legal system is a fraud. The full version of this article has information explaining why a U.S. Citizen is a corporate slave. It also exposes the dirty secrets of social security. As always, use your intuition and critical thinking skills to discern the information below. ~ PL Chang

(FourWinds10.net) DEAR PATRICK & ANNE, CASPER-WENDY & ASSOCIATES,  & ALL FOURWINDS READERS:

This post by “S” is especially for all who have known AND have done nothing; and all who do not know AND cannot act for themselves.

Secondarily, this post is also intended for the reading pleasure of Storytellers who pride themselves much on their sacred knowledge re: the history of the United States of America / THE UNITED STATES / THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and on all matters current; Whistleblowers who remain mute and moot as to certain historical facts from the legal memory of the “United States of America”, as distinct from “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, facts of which seem to be taboo, off radar for unknown reasons.

And, of course, I cannot forget to address “Officers and Employees”, “Agents / Agencies”, and “Instrumentalities” and “persons” of the CORPORATION, aka THE UNITED STATES / THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

TAKE HEED AND TAKE NOTE!!

This also includes the living men and women of the UNITED STATES military – police – intelligence occupational force which operates on and over the land and People of the[se] one for several united States of America; also for “Keepers” and “Trustees” of the [obscured lie] of the “federal” [i.e. “corporate”] BANRUPTCY. And, lastly, for all Nations of the World which have participated in the GRAND PONZI – ARTIFICE AND SCHEME, knowingly or otherwise… IN TRUTH AND IN COMMERCE:

WHO OWNS YOU??!! PART I – BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Commentary with supporting research is in follow up to an article posted on Fourwinds June 21, 2009 by Jim Kirwan, “Who Owns You?”. I thank Mr. Kirwan for his post to Fourwinds10 on the subject, which along with all other more current and related posts by various veritas [Truth in / of Origin] writers, including Casper & Associates, has given me renewed inspiration to elaborate on Mr. Kirwan’s subject  in greater detail.

I do not recall if I have previously posted to Fourwinds a brief summary research document titled “Who Owns You?” or not. If I have, my apologies to those who find the following redundant or overly burdensome to read.

The subject matter which follows is critical to comprehension and Understanding as to what the status of THE UNITED STATES / THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, corporation(s) is / are. The following facts are consistent with and supportive of the article posted to Fourwinds10 as cited above, although it is but a thumb nail of what the Nations and Peoples of the World need to take cognizance of if they are to chose to freely associate with or without one another in the future, especially where “THE UNITED STATES” / “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” is at issue or may be involved.

Presently, much depends on the reinstatement and subsequent treatment of the organic Compacts which have founded the[se] United States of America, quite distinct and diverse from the jurisdiction and status of “THE UNITED STATES” / “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” / “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA”, de facto corporations. This subject has been covered in writings previously posted by “S” and other writer-researchers, now archived at Fourwinds10.

In order to help all readers “grok” what I, Casper, Wendy, the Bellringers, and many enLighted workers for good are talking about, and what the real “war” raging behind the false controlled or inculcated perceptions of the mainstream ‘reality show’ is all about, I provide the following case law determinations for starters:

SOVEREIGNS WITHOUT SUBJECTS – ESTABLISHED BY THE TREATY OF PARIS 1783:

This case was decided in 1795 by the US Supreme Court as it existed at that time, just twelve years after the Treaty of Paris of 1783. This case defines “government” succinctly and leaves no room for misinterpretation:

Summary: Penhallow vs. Doanes Administrators, 3 US 54; 1L.Ed. 57, 3 Dall. 54.:

Governments are corporations; Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only [an idea], a government can only interface with other artificial persons. The imaginary – having neither actuality or Substance – is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of that is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate artificial persons and the contracts between them.

In short, there is no ‘parity’ or ‘equality’ between a tangible ‘real’ Living Man of Substance and the idea or imaginative construction of a created form of government that has been cause to arise as an artificial person, abstraction of a “fiction”. As such, there is no government that can concern itself directly with ‘in’ the affairs of the Living Man, as the Living [tangible] Man [of Substance] is superior in every regard and cannot be subordinated by the abstraction that is a mere idea operating in the form of “government”.

Note: “government” is either by mutual will and informed consent or agreement, OR is by proxy, default, or otherwise [ie. conquest, occupation, compelled, induced, or by misrepresentation, fraud, deceipt, obfuscation].

Note: Does this case not also provide the reader insight into why it is that the governments of the world, including THE UNITED STATES / THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and every other ‘sovereign’ nation or government entity, including THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, WORLD BANK, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY – INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE etc. etc. etc. must convert the Living Man of Substance into an abstraction just like itself, a corporate legal – commercial fiction, in order to ‘contract’ or otherwise use various means to ‘enter into the affairs’ of the “person” that the government alleges to govern? Thus, if there is alleged to be any transaction or exchange between a real Living Man of Substance and [the ‘idea’] the abstract corporate government, it cannot be direct, but must be indirect by and through a ‘transfer agent’ / ‘agency’ or a ‘transmitting utility’ [UCC terminology] for interface and interaction.  This agent / agency within the admiralty law commercial zone of the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA is called a ‘US person’, “vessel”, ‘citizen’, ‘individual’, ‘resident’, ‘non resident’, ‘alien’, ‘taxpayer’, ‘beneficiary’, etc. etc. etc. That “person” is not the real Living Man of Substance, but is an ‘enfranchised’ abstraction and fictional representation of the ‘real’, which NAME is always spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, in the same manner that SLAVE NAMES were entered of record as real property” of their owners, and “vessels” are ‘flagged’ in admiralty – maritime – martial law jurisdiction and venue.

Read full article

Share Button

For more content related to this article, check out these empowering and enlightening books!

Donate to Help Make a Difference

OmniThought.org is a true independent blog because it is not financed and controlled by banksters. If you like reading the articles on this site, please take action now by clicking the "Donate" button below to send a donation to the author/editor. Your generous support will help fund his research and expenses, allowing him to continue his quest to educate and teach people to create a better world for everyone.


Tags: , , , ,

Category: Freedom & Sovereignty, Man's & Corporate Law

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy: Please keep comment relevant to the content of the article. Profanity, spamming and use of threatening language will not be tolerated. Links are allowed but please do not spam the comment section with excessive links. Dead, inappropriate, excessive or advertising links will be removed. I reserve the right to edit or delete any comments that I feel are inappropriate.