Constitutional Authority? Why the U.S. Constitution Does Not Apply to You (the Living Man or Woman)

Authored or posted by | Updated on | Published on February 21, 2017 | 2 Replies
Share Button

If you like the following article, I highly encourage you to read the article titled The U.S. Constitution Con: Why Freedom in the USA is an Illusion. This article explains in greater detail why the U.S Constitution was a fraudulent contract before and after it was signed by the so called Founding Fathers. – Pao Chang

Picture of the U.S. Constitution

By NotAPersonOrCitizen.BlogSpot.com

Why in the Constitution, are the words ‘People’ and ‘Posterity’ capitalized?

Before that question is answered, take note of this definition:a capitonym is a word that changes its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized, and usually applies to capitalization due to proper nouns or eponyms.

PREAMBLE to the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

There is obviously no living signatory to that declaration (Constitution) – contract, so the next question to ask is:

Are “We” then considered to be one of “We the People”?

Answer: When the authors capitalized these words (capitonym), the meaning was changed to reflect a particular group of “People” and the “Prosperity” was for the authors’ future generations, not ours.

This simply means that the U.S. Constitution may only apply to those who have sworn an oath to uphold it. (public officials/servants and police/military personnel) Have an issue with that? – see the definition of ‘cognitive dissonance’. This is NOT suggesting that the INTENT of the authors’ wasn’t honorable. However, when dealing with CONTRACT LAW – all facets must be thoroughly studied.

SEE THESE IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS:

Definition of CONSTITUTION, contracts. The constitution of a contract, is the making of the contract as, the written constitution of a debt. 1 Bell’s Com. 332, 5th ed.

Definition of CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation. Inst. 4, 6, 9.

No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority

https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/lysander-spooner/no-treason-the-constitution-of-no-authority/

Audio or book in pdf download

The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing.

It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living…And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts.

http://www.lysanderspooner.org

Picture of Lysander Spooner's Quote on the Constitution

This article was originally titled “Constitutional Authority?” It was found on NotAPersonOrCitizen.BlogSpot.com and republished on this website for educational purposes.

Share Button

Donate to Help Make a Difference

OmniThought.org is a true independent blog and is free of third-party ads. If you like reading the articles on this site, please take action now by clicking the "Donate" button below to send a donation to the author/editor. Your generous support will help fund his research and expenses, allowing him to continue his quest to educate and teach people to create a better world for everyone.


Category: Freedom & Sovereignty

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anabel says:

    The other thing about the constitution it is fraud as the people did not write it but it says they did and SO the Govt of the corporation of the US has no mandate (and is not legal under contract law).
    The US Govt have no valid social contract in law.
    No basis that is why it goes on and on about the Constitution so much.

  2. Anabel says:

    ….the document is forgery (and fraud).

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy: Please keep comment relevant to the content of the article. Profanity, spamming and use of threatening language will not be tolerated. Links are allowed but please do not spam the comment section with excessive links. Dead, inappropriate, excessive or advertising links will be removed. I reserve the right to edit or delete any comments that I feel are inappropriate. The comment section will automatically close after 180 days (about 6 months) of the article's published date.