Beware of ‘Presumptions’ – They’re Everywhere!

Authored or posted by | Updated on | Published on June 8, 2017 | Reply
Share Button

The following article has some important information about the legal system, so I decided to publish it. By publishing it does not mean that I agree with all of its information. For example, in the article there is a paragraph that says:

“There is no way out of the deceptive traps of “presumptive adhesion contracts” other than to formally rebut the presumptions that seemingly tie us to them. We must define our legal characters as living flesh and blood men and women and rebut the presumption that we are nothing more than legal fictions. And the best way to do that is to publish your Notice of Condition Precedent.”

Instead of defining our legal characters as living flesh and blood men and women, we need to correct our status by letting the court know that we are living and spiritual men and women, and NOT legal characters, such as legal fictions, “persons”, corporations and names. The purpose of this is to separate the living men and women made of flesh and blood from the “persons”.

The only laws that living men and women are bound to are the Laws of Nature or Natural Law. However, if you agree to be a legal name (legal fiction), you are bound to the “laws” of the legal system. The best power to use to nullify all legal contracts is the power of Natural Law. Why? Because Natural Law is above all laws made by men and governments. To learn more about Natural Law, visit my website EsotericKnowledge.me and become a member.

As always, use your intuition and critical thinking skills to discern the information below. – Pao

Picture of strawman definition

By AntiCorruptionSociety.com

OUR ENTIRE LEGAL SYSTEM IS BUILT ON ‘PRESUMPTIONS’ THAT WE HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO RECOGNIZE AND REBUT.

As a result of the Bankruptcy of America in 1933, everything changed. The changes that started in the 30s were formalized in the 50s-60s, when the Uniform Commercial Code was installed (by stealth) into each state.

From attorney Melvin Stamper’s book Fruit from a Poisonous Tree (pg 62):

In the 1950s, the Uniform Commercial Code was adopted in most of the States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive adhesion contracts. Debt instruments with collateral and accommodating parties could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of law had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid-1960s.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures which all people engaged in commercial activity must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900s, the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a major element of the law. Without giving a degree of force to legal presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in Equity/Admiralty courts and had no chance in common law. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles articulated in the commercial code combine the methods of dealing with substantive commercial activity with presumptive commercial activity. These principles work as well for us as they do for the entrenched powers. The rules are neutral and respect neither side of a dispute, as they are ancient in origin.

The entrenched powers that engineered the scheme for the people to register their property and person with the United States and its instrumentalities gained control of the peoples’ property and right to property through registration and licensing. The United States became the trustee of the titles to everything. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. The International Bankers made profits by pledging as surety the registered property of the people in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the Bankers. The profits belong to the owners of the thing. That is always the people. The corporation government shows only ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. Sometimes the fiction is manufactured to appear as substance, but fiction can never become substance; it is an illusion. This is why the proper spelling of your name in upper and lower case is never used in court documents. The ALL CAPS spelling represents the legal fiction, which the government holds title to and jurisdiction over, as it is the creation of the government. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. What will happen when you appear and claim the name ascribed on the complaint? You and the fiction become one and the same; you have changed masks from a natural person to an artificial one.

Conclusion

There is no way out of the deceptive traps of “presumptive adhesion contracts” other than to formally rebut the presumptions that seemingly tie us to them. We must define our legal characters as living flesh and blood men and women and rebut the presumption that we are nothing more than legal fictions. And the best way to do that is to publish your Notice of Condition Precedent.

For those who are not yet convinced of the importance of “defining your legal character”, please listen to this courtroom debate between a live man and a nasty deceptive judge in Florida:

[To listen to the courtroom debate, visit AntiCorruptionSociety.com and scroll down to the end of the article to find the audio player and click on the play button.]

This article was found on AntiCorruptionSociety.com and republished on this website for educational purposes.

Share Button

Donate to Help Make a Difference

OmniThought.org is a true independent blog and is free of third-party ads. If you like reading the articles on this site, please take action now by clicking the "Donate" button below to send a donation to the author/editor. Your generous support will help fund his research and expenses, allowing him to continue his quest to educate and teach people to create a better world for everyone.


Category: Freedom & Sovereignty, The Legal System

Leave a Reply

Comment Policy: Please keep comment relevant to the content of the article. Profanity, spamming and use of threatening language will not be tolerated. Links are allowed but please do not spam the comment section with excessive links. Dead, inappropriate, excessive or advertising links will be removed. I reserve the right to edit or delete any comments that I feel are inappropriate. The comment section will automatically close after 180 days (about 6 months) of the article's published date.